1. SES
1.1
This
week’s assignment consists on thinking of a social-ecological system in which
we are an active part and in which private firms play a role.
When
thinking about a resource that I exploit daily, what first came to mind
was water. As a Socio-ecological system water distribution is a system in
which individuals, industries, farms, and almost any other human discipline take part on.
It
is Ostrom’s view that in order to understand any system, and to be able to assess
the level of sustainability of the same, it is important to be able to analyze
the relationship between multiple levels of these complex systems.
Under
Ostrom’s framework, the complex social-ecological system of water distribution
could be depicted as follows:
First
level core subsystems:
Resource
System: i.e. Oceans, seas, ponds, rivers and any other form of water reservoir.
Resource
Units: i.e. fresh water, waste water, farming water, water for industrial use.
Governance
System: Here I’m more familiar with the regulatory institutions of my own
country (i.e. National Water Commission), but such private and governmental associations
exist within every country or system, enforcing policies towards the
consumption, distribution, regulation of use, treatment and management of water
resources.
Users:
Individual consumption (i.e. households), Industry (water used for industrial processes i.e.
oil extraction), Industry i.e. bottling companies, Farmers (i.e. water used
for farmlands)
These
first level subsystems are interconnected within this SES, and the actions of
any single one of them, will affect the ability of this system to sustain
itself.
In her paper, Elinor Ostrom identifies 10 subsystem variables that
affect the likelihood of a self-organization in efforts to achieve a
sustainable SES.
She argues that changes in these variables may increase or
diminish the transaction cost, reducing or increasing the likelihood of self-organization.
1.2 How can Friedman's
principle be put to constructive use in the sustainable management of this SES?
'The business of business is to increase profit’
Water is a public good and in general governmental institutions
manage it, however, some examples of self-organization come to mind in the case
of my home country.
In three Mexican cities, private companies provide water and
sanitation services. In these cities, the government gave concessions to three
different private entities for the water sanitation.
Mexican government subsidizes the cost of running water for every
household, and costs have remained very low with the passing of time.
If these private companies seek to make profit from water
sanitation and distribution, it is to their best interest to improve wastewater
treatment technology and processing. By maximizing process capacity, making
them more energy efficient, increasing the yield of the processes, and thus providing
better water quality at a higher rate, they would be reducing their transaction
costs and increasing their profit.
In this way the system would be benefited, clean water more readily
available and developed of treatment technologies through private investment,
adding up to making this system more sustainable.
As such, by living under Friedman’s principle and making their business
to increase profit, these private entities would be helping make this water
system more sustainable.
Hi, I liked that you used specific examples of your home country water supply companies to explain your point but I would also be very interested to know more details about the operations and how exactly does “improve wastewater treatment technology and processing” benefit them.
ReplyDeleteAnd on the similar note, I think it would also be helpful to the readers if you can explain a bit more about Ostrom's 10 subsystem variables, assuming your readership is the general public.
Hope it makes sense :)
Thanks Vigil! you are right! I'll make sure to elavorate a bit more on Ostrom's subsystem variables so it is more clear for the "general publc" thank you!
DeleteHI!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog! It’s concise, clear and it directly “cuts to the core” of the main question. One sentence is a bit too long: “It is Ostrom’s view that in order to understand any system, and to be able to assess the level of sustainability of the same, it is important to be able to analyze the relationship between multiple levels of these complex systems.” For the rest of the sentences: smooth read.
Another advice is to elaborate a bit more on the last three paragraphs/sentences of 1.1. Maybe you can apply the subsystems (or a selection). I am also interested in the interactions and outcomes of the SES. Or try to link the sentences more to the main argument of your blog. In this way it becomes one answer instead of different interesting, but a bit loose parts.
Another question regarding the content. I think it’s very good that you use the concept of private and public firms to link the SES to Friedman. One question remains: How are the subsidies distributed? Because, if there is no negative correlation between the subsidy and water usage, companies could also gain more profit by simply selling more water. Is this sustainable?
Thanks!
Please let me know, if anything is unclear! I'm happy to help.
p.s. Sorry that I’m too late! I ‘ve been sick for the past few weeks, so I’m a bit behind schedule